Mr. Whistler's famous "Woman in White" is amongst the rejected pictures.... The hangers must have thought her particularly ugly, for they have given her a sort of place of honour, before an opening through which all pa.s.s, so that n.o.body misses her.

I watched several parties, to see the impression the "Woman in White"

made on them. They all stopped instantly, struck with amazement. This for two or three seconds; then they always looked at each other and laughed.

Here, for once, I have the happiness to be quite of the popular way of thinking.

[21]P. G. HAMERTON, _Fine Arts Quarterly_.

[Note 21: "Corot is one of the most celebrated landscape painters in France. The first impression of an Englishman, on looking at his works, is that they are the sketches of an amateur; it is difficult at first sight to consider them the serious performances of an artist.... I _understand Corot now_, and think his reputation, if not well deserved, at least easily accounted for.... Corot must be an early riser."--P. G.

HAMERTON, _Fine Arts Quarterly_.]

[Note 21: "Dore (Gustave Paul).... He is a great and marvellous genius--a poet such as a nation produces once in a thousand years. He is the most imaginative, the profoundest, the most productive poet that has ever sprung from the French race."--P. G. HAMERTON, _Fine Arts Quarterly_.]

[Note 21: "Daubigny (Charles Francois).--If landscape can be satisfactorily painted without either drawing or colour--Daubigny is the man to do it."--P. G.

HAMERTON, _Fine Arts Quarterly_.]

[Note 21: "M. Courbet is looked upon as the representative of Realism in France. The truth is that Edouard Frere, the Bonheurs, and many others are to the full as realistic as Courbet but they produce beautiful pictures.... It is difficult to speak of Courbet, without losing patience. Everything he touches becomes unpleasant."--P. G. HAMERTON, _Fine Arts Quarterly_.]

_The Fate of an Anecdote_

_TO THE EDITOR:_

[Sidenote: _New York Tribune_, Sept. 12, 1880]

Sir--In _Scribner's Magazine_ for this month there appears an article on Mr. Seymour Haden, the eminent surgeon etcher, by a Mr. Hamerton, and in this article I have stumbled upon a curious statement concerning, strangely enough, my own affairs, offered pleasantly in the disguise of an anecdote habitually "narrated" by the Doctor himself, and printed effectively in inverted commas, as here shown:

... "A parallel anecdote is narrated by Mr. Haden: 'The most exquisite series of plates which Whistler ever did--his sixteen Thames subjects--were originally printed by a steel-plate printer, and so badly that the owner thought the plates were worn out, and sold them for a small sum in comparison to their real worth. The purchaser took them to Goulding, the best printer of etchings in England, and it was found that they were not only perfect, but that they produced impressions which had never before been approached even by Delatre.'"

Putting gently aside the question of these plates being superior to all previous or subsequent work, and dealing merely with facts, I have to say that they were _not_ "originally printed by a steel-plate printer"; that the impressions were _not_ so bad that the owner thought the plates worn out; and, flattering as is the supposition that they were sold for a small sum in comparison to their real worth, I am obliged to reject even this palatable a.s.sertion, as I received for the plates the price that I asked, knowing full well their exact condition.

Instead of the "steel-plate printer," Delatre, then at his prime, had himself printed these etchings--a fact which, amusingly enough, Mr.

Haden admits further on, in direct contradiction to his first broad statement. Moreover, I had myself pulled proofs of them all; indeed, one in the set of sixteen plates, a drypoint, called "The Forge" (for by the way they were not all of the Thames), I alone printed. When the plates left my hands they were _not_ "taken to Goulding," who at that moment had, I fancy, barely begun his career as "the best printer of etchings in England" (and a capital printer he certainly is); and it was _not_ "found that they produced impressions never before approached even by Delatre"--here we have the contradiction alluded to--no!

this theatrical denouement I must also put aside with sorrow.

The plates were brought out by Messrs. Ellis, who had them printed by some one in London, whose work was certainly not to be compared to that of Delatre, whom I should undoubtedly have recommended; so that _it was only long after the sale had been completed and the plates had ceased to be in my possession_, that inferior impressions were produced.

The understanding on my part with those publishers was that the plates were to be destroyed after one hundred impressions had been taken, but very recently they reappeared, and were sold to their present possessors, who _did_ take them to Mr. Goulding. And here I am obliged to explain away the last element of astonishment, for Mr. Goulding naturally found the etchings in their original perfect condition simply because I had had them steeled in their full bloom when I had satisfied myself by my own proofs.

Goulding's impressions of these plates are very excellent, but to say they were quite unapproached by Delatre is not only needless exaggeration, but an unkindness to Mr. Goulding.

Surely there must be some misunderstanding between Mr. Haden and his biographer--a misdeal of data--an accident with the anecdotes--because no one was more keenly alive to all relating to these plates and their various states than Mr. Haden himself, whose strong sense of the importance of printing was acquired while watching the progress of these same plates, and the previous French set, as they were proved by me and printed by Delatre, to whom I introduced him.

Far from me to spoil a good story; but for the life of me I cannot see what any sympathizing _raconteur_ will regret in the destruction of this mere jumble of statistics that Mr. Hamerton calls "Mr. Haden's anecdote."

VENICE, Aug. 16, 1880.

[Ill.u.s.tration]

_In Excelsis_

Mr. Hamerton presents his compliments to Mr. Whistler, and begs to inform him that he has read Mr. Whistler's very unbecoming and improper letter in the _New York Tribune_.

Mr. Hamerton in his article in _Scribner's Monthly_ simply quoted a pa.s.sage from one of Mr. Haden's lectures on Etching, published in Ca.s.sell's _Magazine of Art_; consequently Mr. Hamerton did not offer matter to his readers under any disguise whatever. Mr. Hamerton has answered Mr. Whistler's letter in the same journal in which it appeared.

PRe CHARMOY, AUTUN, SAoNE ET LOIRE, Sept. 28, 1880.

_A Suspicion_

It is possibly too much to expect--upon the principle of "trumps not turning up twice"--but Mr. Whistler does hope that Mr. Hamerton's letter to the _New York Tribune_ will be as funny as his note to Mr.

Whistler, which has just been forwarded from London.

VENICE, Oct. 7.

CAFe FLORIAN, PLACE SAN MARC.

Pardon! Is Mr. Whistler right in supposing, from the droll little irritation shown in Mr. Hamerton's note, that Mr. Hamerton is perhaps--another "Art Critic"?

[Ill.u.s.tration]

_Conviction_

_TO THE EDITOR:_

[Sidenote: _New York Tribune_, Oct. 11, 1880.]

Sir--A friend in America has sent me the letter from Mr. Whistler which refers to my article in _Scribner_ on Mr. Haden's etchings. The letter begins as follows:

In _Scribner's Magazine_ for this month there appears an article on Mr. Seymour Haden, the eminent surgeon etcher by a Mr. Hamerton, and in this article I have stumbled upon a curious statement concerning--strangely enough--my own affairs, offered pleasantly in the disguise of an anecdote habitually 'narrated' by the Doctor himself, and printed effectively in inverted commas, as here shown.

Here Mr. Whistler accuses me of disguising something which I chose to tell, as if it came from Mr. Haden, by printing it in inverted commas.

The statement is "offered pleasantly in the disguise of an anecdote,"

and "printed effectively in inverted commas." I used inverted commas because it is the custom to do so when making a quotation. I quoted Mr. Haden's own words from one of his lectures on etching, and they will be found printed, as I quoted them, in Ca.s.sell's _Magazine of Art_. I beg to be permitted to observe that a writer who quotes a pa.s.sage, as I did, in perfect good faith, ought not to be accused of offering matter in disguise. There was no disguise about it. Mr.

Haden's words may be compared with my quotation. Again, to prevent any possible inaccuracy, a proof of the article in _Scribner_ was sent to Mr. Haden before it was published.[22] It is scarcely necessary that I should allude to Mr. Whistler's studied discourtesy in calling me "a Mr. Hamerton." It does me no harm, but it is a breach of ordinary good manners in speaking of a well-known writer!