"Physiciens and advocates, Gon right by the same yates, _yates, gates_ They selle hir science for winning. _winning, gain_
For they nil in no maner gree _no kind of good will_ Do right nought for charitee."
The same idea, precisely, finds voice in the poem attributed to Walter Map, wherein the doctor and the lawyer come together under the lash, because no hope can be based upon either of them unless there be money in the case. "But if the marvellous man see coin, the very worst disease is quite curable, the very falsest cause just, praiseworthy, pious, true, and pleasing to G.o.d." Perhaps these ancient sarcasms were keener on the leech than the lawyer. "The Romaunt of the Rose" goes so far as to say that if the physicians had their way of it,
"Everiche man shulde be seke, And though they dye, they set not a leke After: whan they the gold have take Ful litel care for hem they make.
They wolde that fourty were seke at onis!
Ye, two hundred in flesh and bonis!
And yit two thousand as I gesse For to encresen her richesse."
No doubt the men of medicine would have been much more vulnerable on another line, for it was no satirist but a learned medical professor, Arnauld de Villeneuve, who, in the beginning of the fourteenth century, advised his students as follows:--"The seventh precaution," said he, "is of a general application. Suppose that you cannot understand the case of your patient, say to him with a.s.surance that he hath an obstruction of the liver." No legal professor surely was ever guilty of the indiscretion of _saying_ such a thing as this!
The ineradicable public prejudice against legal charges as flagrantly exorbitant is only a modified form of an older idea exemplified above that lawyers should have no fees at all. And as to this day the plain man has never fully reconciled himself to the doctrine that the lawyer is only an agent, and not called upon to sit in the first instance in judgment on his client, so in the past the professional defence of a criminal appeared a very venal transaction.
"Thow I have a man i-slawe, And forfetyd the kynges lawe I sal fyndyn a man of lawe Wyl takyn myn peny and let me goo."
How reprehensible a thing to take fees was long reckoned admits of curious ill.u.s.tration. "Before the end of the thirteenth century," says that never-failing authority, Pollock and Maitland's "History of English Law,"
"there already exists a legal profession, a cla.s.s of men who make money by representing litigants before the courts and by giving legal advice.
The evolution of this cla.s.s has been slow, for it has been withstood by certain ancient principles." Amongst these r.e.t.a.r.ding influences lay the half-religious scruple about the propriety of payment--men as usual swallowing the camel first and straining at the gnat afterwards. Of course the subject had to be illuminated by monkish tales and death-bed repentances. There was, according to the Carlisle friar who penned the "The Chronicle of Lanercost,"--writing under the year 1288,--a young clerk in the diocese of Glasgow, whose mind "was given rather to the court of the rich than to the cure of souls. He was called Adam Urri, and was laically learned in the laic laws, disregarding the commands of G.o.d against the Praecorialia [so in the printed text, but, query, Praetorialia?] of Ulpian. He used the statutes of the Emperor in litigating causes, for payment of money. But when he had grown old and famous in this his wickedness, and was striving by his astuteness to entangle the affairs of a poor little widow, the divine mercy laid hold on him, a.s.sailing his body with sudden infirmity, and bringing his mind to plead (_enarraret_) more for another life." Condemning utterly the lawyer's court, he turned over a new leaf, predicted the day of his own death, and died punctually conform to the prophecy, leaving an example unctuously used by the friar to teach future generations "how wide was the gulf betwixt the service of G.o.d and the vanity of this world." We shall not be far wrong in regarding, as of more historic interest, the indication of the immorality of fees, and the important reference to Ulpian as an authority in the _forum causidicorum_ of thirteenth century Scotland.
Amongst the amiable conceptions of the middle age was the notion that the Evil One often manifested a particular zeal against sin. He was regarded with a different eye from that with which we regard him, and he rewarded faith with actual appearances such as only spiritualists can now-a-days command. Some of them were not very engaging, however praiseworthy may have been their object and occasion. Simeon of Durham, an eminently respectable contemporary author, wrote of the death of King William Rufus in the year 1100 that the popular voice considered the wandering flight of Tyrell's arrow a token of the "virtue and vengeance of G.o.d." And he added that about that time the Devil had frequently shewn himself in the woods "and no wonder, because in those days law and justice were all but silent." The logic of this _because_, not apparent on the surface, becomes less obscure when it is remembered that in the mediaeval devil the character of Arch-Enemy is so much subordinated to that of Arch-Avenger.
The direct relation of not only the Saints but of the Deity itself to human affairs was a conception so clear to the mediaeval mind that it saw nothing irreverent in a t.i.tle deed being taken in the Supreme name, or in marshalling "_Deus Omnipotens_" at the head of the list of witnesses to a charter. This anthropomorphic practice gave occasion to one of the sharpest of Walter Map's jokes against the Cistercians. Three abbots of that order pet.i.tioning on behalf of one of their number and his abbey for the restoration of certain lands by King Henry II. as having been injuriously taken away from the claimant's abbey, represented to the King in his court that for G.o.d's sake he ought to cause the lands to be restored and they a.s.sured him and gave him G.o.d himself as their guarantor (_fidejussorem_) that if he did, G.o.d would greatly increase his honour upon earth. King Henry found it difficult to resist the appeal thus made to him but called the Archdeacon Walter Map to advise. This he did well-knowing that this counsellor did not love the Cistercians, and that he might thus find a creditable way out of a tight corner. The Archdeacon was equal to the occasion. "My lord," said he to the King, "they offer you a guarantor; you should hear their guarantor speak for himself." "By the eyes of G.o.d," replied Henry, "it is just and conform to reason that guarantors themselves should be heard upon the matter of their guarantee."
Then rising with a gentle smile (not a grin, expressly says Giraldus Cambrensis) the shrewd monarch retired leaving the disappointed abbots covered with confusion.
Of the many ties between literature and law, one, not by any means the least interesting on the list, is the quant.i.ty of legal citations, phrases, metaphors and a.n.a.logies which got swept into the wide nets of the poets. Amongst such sc.r.a.ps there are few so successful and still fewer so pathetic as one in which a metrical historian, drawing near the close, both of his days and his chronicle, figured himself as summoned on short _induciae_ at the instance of Old Age to appear at a court to answer serious charges, where no help was for him save through grace and the Virgin as his advocate.
Elde me maistreis wyth hir brevis, _elde, age_ Ilke day me sare aggrevis, _brevis, writ_ Scho has me maid monitioune _ilke, each_ To se for a conclusioune _quhilk, which_ The quhilk behovis to be of det; _of det, of right_ Quhat term of tyme of that be set I can wyt it be na way, _wyt, know_ Bot weill I wate on schort delay At a court I mon appeire Fell accusationis thare til here Quhare na help thare is bot grace. _bot, without_ The maikless Madyn mon purchace _maikless, matchless_ That help; and to sauff my state _purchace, procure_ I haiff maid hir my advocate. _sauff, save_
Androw of Wyntoun's verse it must be owned was verse on the plane of a notary public, and oft the common form of legal writ supplied sorrily enough the deficiencies of his imagination. But here for once the simple dignity of the thought bore him up and carried him through.