(3) En Octobre, 1890, je me trouvais avec ma femme et mon fils, age de deux ans, chez mes anciens amis, les Strijewsky, a leur campagne du gouvernement de Woroneje. Un jour, vers les 7 h. du soir, rentrant de la cha.s.se, je pa.s.sai dans l'aile que nous habitons pour changer de toilette; j'etais a.s.sis dans une chambre eclairee par une grande lampe. La porte s'ouvrit et mon fils Oleg accourut; il se tenait aupres de mon fauteuil, quand Palladia apparut tout a coup devant moi. Jetant sur lui un coup d'il, je remarquai qu'il ne detachait pas les yeux de Palladia; se tournant vers moi et montrant Palladia du doigt, il p.r.o.nonca: "La tante." Je le pris sur les genoux et jetai un regard sur Palladia, mais elle n'etait plus. Le visage d'Oleg etait tout a fait tranquil et joyeux; il commencait seulement a parler, ce qui explique la denomination qu'il donna a Palladia.

EUGeNE MAMTCHITCH.

Mrs. Mamtchitch writes:--

_5 Mai, 1891._

Je me rappelle tres bien que le 10 Juillet 1885, lorsque nous etions en visite chez les parents de M. E. Mamtchitch, je m'etais reveillee a l'aube du jour, car il avait ete convenu entre moi et ma sur que nous irions faire une promenade matinale. M'etant soulevee sur le lit, je vis que maman et ma sur dormaient, et en ce moment je sentis comme si quelqu'un se tenait a mon chevet.

M'etant tournee a demi--car je craignais de bien regarder--je ne vis personne; m'etant recouchee, j'entendis immediatement, derriere et au dessus de ma tete, une voix de femme me disant doucement, mais distinctement: "Ne me crains pas, je suis bonne et aimante,"

et encore toute une phrase que j'oubliai a l'instant meme.

Immediatement apres je m'habillai et j'allai me promener. C'est etrange que ces paroles ne m'effrayerent pas du tout. De retour, je n'en dis rien ni a ma mere, ni a ma sur, car elles n'aimaient pas de telles choses et n'y croyaient pas; mais le soir du meme jour, comme la conversation tourna sur le spiritisme, je racontai a M. M. ce qui venait de m'arriver le matin; il ne me repondit rien de particulier.

Je n'ai jamais eu aucune hallucination, ni avant, ni apres cet incident, a l'exception d'un cas tout recent, quand je me suis vue moi-meme, de quoi je parlerai une autre fois.

SOPHIE MAMTCHITCH.

Mr. Potolof writes to Mr. Aksakoff, through whom the case was sent:--

RUE SCHPALERNAYA, 26. S. PeTERSBOURG, _le 10 Mai, 1891_.

MONSIEUR,--En reponse a votre lettre du 8 Mai et les questions que vous me posez relativement a l'incident avec M. E. Mamtchitch, lorsque dans les annees 1876-77 nous habitions ensemble Kieff, rue Proresnaya, maison Barsky, je puis vous communiquer ce qui suit.

Effectivement, je fus alors temoin comme M. M., pendant qu'il jouait un soir du piano quelque air melancolique, s'interrompait brusquement (comme si apres avoir fortement attaque le clavier, ses mains s'etaient subitement affaissees), et lorsque je vins lui demander ce qui lui etait arrive, il me repondit qu'il venait de voir apparaitre le fantome de Palladia, se tenant derriere la draperie de la porte de la chambre contigue a celle ou se trouvait le piano. Je dois ajouter que notre appartement commun formait une enfilade de trois chambres, sans compter celle de l'entree, qui occupait le milieu; je travaillais dans ma chambre, qui etait a droite de celle de l'entree, et je pouvais voir toute l'enfilade bien eclairee. Ce qui me regarde personnellement, je ne vis en ce moment aucune figure humaine pa.s.ser par les chambres de M. M., mais je ne nie pas que pour le tranquilliser j'essayai d'expliquer cet incident par l'entree de notre domestique Nikita; il se peut aussi que, ne l'ayant pas trouve dans nos appartements, nous allames le chercher en bas, dans la cuisine. Voila tout ce que je puis vous dire relativement a cet incident.

W. POTOLOF.

Note by Mr. Aksakoff:--

S. PeTERSBOURG, _Le 16

28 Mai, 1891_.

Traduit des ma.n.u.scrits russes de M. et Madame Mamtchitch, et de M.

Potolof. La premiere partie du ma.n.u.scrit de M. Mamtchitch, jusqu'a la premiere apparition de Palladia, est abrege.

J'avais rencontre M. Mamtchitch plusieurs fois, mais je n'avais aucune idee de ces apparitions constantes de Palladia. M.

Mamtchitch a vu aussi d'autres figures que celle de Palladia, mais je n'ai pas eu le temps d'en faire un memorandum circonstantiel.

A. AKSAKOFF.

VII. B. The account, which I quote from _Proceedings_ S.P.R., vol. vi.

p. 17, was sent in 1887 to the American Society for Psychical Research by Mr. F. G., of Boston. Professor Royce and Dr. Hodgson vouch for the high character and good position of the informants; and it will be seen that, besides the percipient himself, his father and brother are first-hand witnesses as regards the most important point,--the effect produced by a certain symbolic item in the phantom's aspect. Mr. G.

writes:--

_January 11th, 1888._

SIR,--Replying to the recently published request of your Society for actual occurrences of psychical phenomena, I respectfully submit the following remarkable occurrence to the consideration of your distinguished Society, with the a.s.surance that the event made a more powerful impression on my mind than the combined incidents of my whole life. I have never mentioned it outside of my family and a few intimate friends, knowing well that few would believe it, or else ascribe it to some disordered state of my mind at the time; but I well know I never was in better health or possessed a clearer head and mind than at the time it occurred.

In 1867 my only sister, a young lady of eighteen years, died suddenly of cholera in St. Louis, Mo. My attachment for her was very strong, and the blow a severe one to me. A year or so after her death the writer became a commercial traveller, and it was in 1876, while on one of my Western trips, that the event occurred.

I had "drummed" the city of St. Joseph, Mo., and had gone to my room at the Pacific House to send in my orders, which were unusually large ones, so that I was in a very happy frame of mind indeed. My thoughts, of course, were about these orders, knowing how pleased my house would be at my success. I had not been thinking of my late sister, or in any manner reflecting on the past. The hour was high noon, and the sun was shining cheerfully into my room. While busily smoking a cigar and writing out my orders, I suddenly became conscious that some one was sitting on my left, with one arm resting on the table. Quick as a flash I turned and distinctly saw the form of my dead sister, and for a brief second or so looked her squarely in the face; and so sure was I that it was she, that I sprang forward in delight, calling her by name, and, as I did so, the apparition instantly vanished.

Naturally I was startled and dumbfounded, almost doubting my senses; but the cigar in my mouth, and pen in hand, with the ink still moist on my letter, I satisfied myself I had not been dreaming and was wide awake. I was near enough to touch her, had it been a physical possibility, and noted her features, expression, and details of dress, etc. She appeared as if alive. Her eyes looked kindly and perfectly natural into mine. Her skin was so life-like that I could see the glow or moisture on its surface, and, on the whole, there was no change in her appearance, otherwise than when alive.

Now comes the most remarkable _confirmation_ of my statement, which cannot be doubted by those who know what I state actually occurred.

This visitation, or whatever you may call it, so impressed me that I took the next train home, and in the presence of my parents and others I related what had occurred. My father, a man of rare good sense and very practical, was inclined to ridicule me, as he saw how earnestly I believed what I stated; but he, too, was amazed when later on I told them of a bright red line or _scratch_ on the right-hand side of my sister's face, which I distinctly had seen.

When I mentioned this my mother rose trembling to her feet and nearly fainted away, and as soon as she sufficiently recovered her self-possession, with tears streaming down her face, she exclaimed that I had indeed seen my sister, as no living mortal but herself was aware of that scratch, which she had accidentally made while doing some little act of kindness after my sister's death. She said she well remembered how pained she was to think she should have, unintentionally, marred the features of her dead daughter, and that, unknown to all, how she had carefully obliterated all traces of the slight scratch with the aid of powder, etc., and that she had never mentioned it to a human being from that day to this. In proof, neither my father nor any of our family had detected it, and positively were unaware of the incident, yet _I saw the scratch as bright as if just made_. So strangely impressed was my mother, that even after she had retired to rest she got up and dressed, came to me and told me _she knew_ at least that I had seen my sister. A few weeks later my mother died, happy in her belief she would rejoin her favourite daughter in a better world.

In a further letter Mr. F. G. adds:--

There was nothing of a spiritual or ghostly nature in either the form or dress of my sister, she appearing perfectly natural, and dressed in clothing that she usually wore in life, and which was familiar to me. From her position at the table, I could only see her _from the waist up_, and her appearance and everything she wore is indelibly photographed in my mind. I even had time to notice the collar and little breastpin she wore, as well as the comb in her hair, after the style then worn by young ladies. The dress had no particular a.s.sociation for me or my mother, no more so than others she was in the habit of wearing; but _to-day, while I have forgotten all her other dresses, pins, and combs_, I could go to her trunk (which we have just as she left it) and pick out the very dress and ornaments she wore when she appeared to me, so well do I remember it.

You are correct in understanding that I returned home earlier than I had intended, as it had such an effect on me that I could hardly think of any other matter; in fact, I abandoned a trip that I had barely commenced, and, ordinarily, would have remained on the road a month longer.

Mr. F. G. again writes to Dr. Hodgson, January 23rd, 1888:--

As per your request, I enclose a letter from my father which is indorsed by my brother, confirming the statement I made to them of the apparition I had seen. I will add that my father is one of the oldest and most respected citizens of St. Louis, Mo., a retired merchant, whose winter residence is at----, Ills., a few miles out by rail. He is now seventy years of age, but a remarkably well-preserved gentleman in body and mind, and a very learned man as well. As I informed you, he is slow to believe things that reason cannot explain. My brother, who indorses the statement, has resided in Boston for twelve years, doing business on---- Street, as per letter-head above, and the last man in the world to take stock in statements without good proof. The others who were present (including my mother) are now dead, or were then so young as to now have but a dim remembrance of the matter.

You will note that my father refers to the "scratch," and it was this that puzzled all, even himself, and which we have never been able to account for, further than that in some mysterious way I had actually seen my sister _nine years after death_, and had particularly noticed and described to my parents and family this bright red scratch, and which, beyond all doubt in our minds, was unknown to a soul save my mother, who had accidentally caused it.

When I made my statement, all, of course, listened and were interested; but the matter would probably have pa.s.sed with comments that it was a freak of memory had not I asked about the scratch, and the instant I mentioned it my mother was aroused as if she had received an electric shock, as she had kept it secret from all, and _she alone_ was able to explain it. My mother was a sincere Christian lady, who was for twenty-five years superintendent of a large infant cla.s.s in her church, the Southern Methodist, and a directress in many charitable inst.i.tutions, and was highly educated. No lady at the time stood higher in the city of St.

Louis, and she was, besides, a woman of rare good sense.

I mention these points to give you an insight into the character and standing of those whose testimony, in such a case, is necessary.

(Signed) F. G.

From Mr. H. G.:--

-----, ILLS., _January 20th, 1888_.

DEAR F.,--Yours of 16th inst. is received. In reply to your questions relating to your having seen our Annie, while at St.

Joseph, Mo., I will state that I well remember the statement you made to family on your return home. I remember your stating how she looked in ordinary home dress, and particularly about the scratch (or red spot) on her face, which you could not account for, but which was fully explained by your mother. The spot was made while adjusting something about her head while in the casket, and covered with powder. All who heard you relate the phenomenal sight thought it was true. You well know how sceptical I am about things which reason cannot explain.

(Signed) H. G. (father).

I was present at the time and indorse the above.

(Signed) K. G. (brother).

The apparent _redness_ of the scratch on the face of the apparition goes naturally enough with the look of life in the face. The phantom did not appear as a corpse, but as a blooming girl, and the scratch showed as it would have shown if made during life.

Dr. Hodgson visited Mr. F. G. later, and sent us the following notes of his interview:--

ST. LOUIS, MO., _April 16th, 1890_.