A New System; or, an a.n.a.lysis of Antient Mythology.

Volume II.

by Jacob Bryant.

PHNIX AND PHNICES.

As there has been much uncertainty about the purport and extent of these terms; and they are of great consequence in the course of history; I will endeavour to state their true meaning. Phoinic, or Poinic, was an Egyptian and Canaanitish term of honour; from whence were formed F?????, F?????e?, F??????e?? of the Greeks, and Phoinic, Poinicus, Poinicius of the Romans; which were afterwards changed to Phnix, Punicus, and [1]Puniceus. It was originally a t.i.tle, which the Greeks made use of as a provincial name: but it was never admitted as such by the people, to whom it was thus appropriated, till the Greeks were in possession of the country. And even then it was but partially received: for though mention is made of the coast of Phnice, yet we find the natives called Sidonians, Tyrians, and [2]Canaanites, as late as the days of the Apostles. It was an honorary term, compounded of Anac with the Egyptian prefix; and rendered at times both Phoinic and Poinic. It signified a lord or prince: and was particularly a.s.sumed by the sons of Chus and Canaan. The Mysians seem to have kept nearest to the original p.r.o.nunciation, who gave this t.i.tle to the G.o.d Dionusus, and called him Ph'anac.

[3]Ogygia me Bacchum vocat, Osirin aegyptus putat, Mysi Phanacem.

It was also conferred upon many things, which were esteemed princely and n.o.ble. Hence the red, or scarlet, a colour appropriated to great and honourable personages, was styled Phoinic. The palm was also styled Phoinic, F?????: and the antients always speak of it as a stately and n.o.ble tree. It was esteemed an emblem of honour; and made use of as a reward of victory. Plurimarum palmarum h.o.m.o, was a proverbial expression among the Romans, for a soldier of merit. Pliny speaks of the various species of palms; and of the great repute in which they were held by the Babylonians.

He says, that the n.o.blest of them were styled the royal Palms; and supposes that they were so called from their being set apart for the king's use. But they were very early an emblem of royalty: and it is a circ.u.mstance included in their original name. We find from Apuleius, that Mercury, the [4]Hermes of Egypt, was represented with a palm branch in his hand: and his priests at Hermopolis used to have them stuck in their [5]sandals, on the outside. The G.o.ddess [6]Isis was thus represented: and we may infer that Hermes had the like ornaments; which the Greeks mistook for feathers, and have in consequence of it added wings to his feet. The Jews used to carry boughs of the same tree at some of their festivals; and particularly at the celebration of their nuptials: and it was thought to have an influence at the birth. Euripides alludes to this in his Ion; where he makes Latona recline herself against a Palm tree, when she is going to produce Apollo and Diana.

[7]F?????a ?a?' ?????a?

???a ???e?ata se?' e???e?sat?

?at?.

In how great estimation this tree was held of old, we may learn from many pa.s.sages in the sacred writings. Solomon says to his espoused, [8]_how fair and how pleasant art thou, O Love, for delights: thy stature is like a Palm tree_. And the Psalmist for an encouragement to holiness, says, [9]_that the righteous shall flourish like the Palm tree_: for the Palm was supposed to rise under a weight; and to thrive in proportion to its being [10]depressed. There is possibly a farther allusion in this, than may at first appear. The antients had an opinion, that the Palm was immortal: at least, if it did die, it recovered again, and obtained a second life by renewal. Hence the story of the bird, styled the Phoenix, is thought to have been borrowed from this tree. Pliny, in describing the species of Palm, styled Syagrus, says, [11]Mirum de ea accepimus, c.u.m Phnice Ave, quae putatur ex hujus Palmae argumento nomen accep.i.s.se, iterum mori, et renasci ex seipsa. Hence we find it to have been an emblem of immortality among all nations, sacred and prophane. The blessed in heaven are represented in the Apocalypse by St. John, [12]as standing before the throne in white robes, with branches of Palm in their hands. The notion of this plant being an emblem of royalty prevailed so far, that when our Saviour made his last entrance into Jerusalem, the people took branches of Palm trees, and accosted him as a prince, crying, [13]_Hosanna--blessed is the King of Israel_.

The t.i.tle of Phoinic seems at first to have been given to persons of great stature: but, in process of time, it was conferred upon people of power and eminence, like a?a? and a?a?te? among the Greeks. The Cuthites in Egypt were styled Royal Shepherds, ?as??e?? ???e?e?, and had therefore the t.i.tle of Phnices. A colony of them went from thence to Tyre and Syria: hence it is said by many writers that Phnix came from Egypt to Tyre. People, not considering this, have been led to look for the shepherd's origin in Canaan, because they were sometimes called Phnices. They might as well have looked for them in Greece; for they were equally styled [14]?????e?, h.e.l.lenes. Phnicia, which the Greeks called F??????, was but a small part of Canaan. It was properly a slip of sea coast, which lay within the jurisdiction of the Tyrians and Sidonians, and signifies Ora Regia; or, according to the language of the country, the coast of the Anakim. It was a lordly t.i.tle, and derived from a stately and august people. All the natives of Canaan seem to have a.s.sumed to themselves great honour. The Philistines are spoken of as [15]Lords, and the merchants of Tyre as Princes; whose grandeur and magnificence are often alluded to in the Scriptures. The prophet Ezekiel calls them the princes of the sea. [16]_Then all the princes of the sea shall come down from their thrones, and lay away their robes, and put off their broidered garments._ And Isaiah speaks to the same purpose. [17]_Who hath taken this counsel against Tyre, that crowning city, whose merchants are princes; whose traffickers are the honourable of the earth?_ The scripture term by which they are here distinguished is ????, Sarim: but the t.i.tle which they a.s.sumed to themselves was Ph'anac, or Ph'oinac, the Phnix of the Greeks and Romans. And as it was a mere t.i.tle, the sacred writers of the old testament never make use of it to distinguish either the people or country. This part of Canaan is never by them called Phnicia: yet others did call it so; and the natives were styled Phnices before the birth of Homer. But this was through mistake; for it was never used by the natives as a provincial appellation. I have shewn that it was a t.i.tle of another sort, a mark of rank and pre-eminence: on this account it was a.s.sumed by other people, and conferred upon other places. For this reason it is never mentioned by any of the sacred writers before the captivity, in order to avoid ambiguity. The Gentile writers made use of it; and we see what mistakes have ensued. There were Phnicians of various countries. They were to be found upon the Sinus [18]Persicus, upon the Sinus [19]Arabicus, in Egypt, in [20]Crete, in [21]Africa, in [22]Epirus, and even in Attica. [23]F?????e?--?e??? t? ?????s?. _There is a race of people called Phnicians_ _among the [24]Athenians._ In short, it was a t.i.tle introduced at Sidon, and the coast adjoining, by people from Egypt: and who the people were that brought it may be known from several pa.s.sages in antient history; but particularly from an extract in Eusebius, [25]F????? ?a? ?ad??, ap? T??? t?? ????pt??? e?e????te? e?? t?? S???a?, ????? ?a? S?d???? eas??e???. _Phnix and Cadmus, retiring from Thebes, in Egypt, towards the coast of Syria, settled at Tyre and Sidon, and reigned there._ It is said, that [26]Belus carried a colony to the same parts: and from what part of the world [27]Belus must be supposed to have come, needs not to be explained. Euripides styles Cepheus the king of Ethiopia, the son of Phnix: and Apollodorus makes him the son of Belus: hence we may infer, that Belus and Phnix were the same. Not that there were any such persons as Phnix and Belus, for they were certainly t.i.tles: and, under the characters of those two personages, Colonies, named Belidae and Phnices, went abroad, and settled in different parts. Their history and appellation may be traced from Babylonia to Arabia and Egypt; and from thence to Canaan, and to the regions in the west. It were therefore to be wished, that the terms Phnix and Phnicia had never been used in the common acceptation; at least when the discourse turns upon the more antient history of Canaan. When the Greeks got possession of the coast of Tyre, they called it Phnicia: and from that time it may be admitted as a provincial name. In consequence of this, the writers of the New Testament do not scruple to make use of it, but always with a proper limitation; for the geography of the Scriptures is wonderfully exact. But the Greek and Roman writers often speak of it with a greater lat.i.tude, and include Judea and Palestina within its borders; and sometimes add Syria and Idume. But these countries were all separate and distinct; among which Phnicia bore but a small proportion. Yet, small as it may have been, many learned men have thought, that all the colonies, which at times settled upon the coast of the Mediterranean, were from this quarter; and that all science was of Phnician original. But this is not true according to their acceptation of the term. Colonies did settle; and science came from the east: but not merely from the Sidonian. I shall shew, that it was princ.i.p.ally owing to a prior and superior branch of the family.

ADDENDA.

_OF THE PALM TREE_.

Phnix was a colour among horses. They were styled Phnices, and [28]Phniciati, from the colour of the Palm tree, which they resembled; and upon the same account had the name of Spadices. This, according to Aulus Gellius, was a term synonymous with the former. [29]Rutilus, et Spadix Phnicii s???????, exuberantiam splendoremque significant ruboris, quales sunt fructus Palmae arboris, nondum sole incocti: unde spadicis et Phnicei nomen est. [30]Spadix, spad??, avulsus est a Palma termes c.u.m fructu.

Homer, describing the horses of Diomedes, says, that the one was Phnix, or of a bright Palm colour, with a white spot in his forehead like a moon.

[31]?? t? e? a??? t?s?? f????? ??, e?de et?p?

?e???? s?' etet??t? pe??t????? ??te ???.

Upon this the Scholiast observes, F?????e? t? ???a, ?t?? p?????. The horse was of a Palm colour, which is a bright red. We call such horses bays, which probably is a term of the same original. The branch of a Palm tree was called Bai in Egypt; and it had the same name in other places. Baia, ?a?a, are used for Palm-branches by St. John. [32]?a a?a t?? F???????. And it is mentioned by the author of the book of Maccabees, that the Jews, upon a solemn occasion, entered the temple. [33]?eta a??ese?? ?a? a???. And Demetrius writes to the high priest, Simon, [34]??? stefa??? t?? ???s???

?a? t?? ?a????, ? apeste??ate, ?e???se?a. Coronam auream et Bainem, quae misistis, accepimus. The Greeks formed the word a??? from the Egyptian Bai. The Romans called the same colour Badius. [35]Varro, speaking of horses, mentions,

Hic badius, ille gilvus, ille Murinus.

As the Palm tree was supposed to be immortal; or, at least, if it did die, to revive, and enjoy a second life, the Egyptians gave the name of Bai to the soul: [36]?st? e? ?a? t? a? ????.

OF THE

TERM CAHEN:

THE

COHEN, ???, OF THE HEBREWS.

I have before taken notice that the term Cahen denoted a Priest, or President; and that it was a t.i.tle often conferred upon princes and kings.

Nor was it confined to men only: we find it frequently annexed to the names of Deities, to signify their rule and superintendency over the earth. From them it was derived to their attendants, and to all persons of a prophetical or sacred character. The meaning of the term was so obvious, that one would imagine no mistake could have ensued: yet such is the perverseness of human wit, that we find it by the Greeks and Romans constantly misapplied. They could not help imagining, from the sound of the word, which approached nearly to that of ???? and canis, that it had some reference to that animal: and, in consequence of this unlucky resemblance, they continually misconstrued it _a dog_. Hence we are told by [37]aelian and [38]Plutarch, not only of the great veneration paid to dogs in Egypt, and of their being maintained in many cities and temples; in which they certainly exceed the truth; but we are moreover a.s.sured, that the people of Ethiopia had a dog for their king: that he was kept in great state, being surrounded with a numerous body of officers and guards, and in all respects royally treated. Plutarch speaks of him as being [39]se??? p??s????e???, worshipped with a degree of religious reverence. The whole of this notion took its rise from a misinterpretation of the t.i.tle above. I have mentioned, that in early times Cahen was a t.i.tle universally conferred upon priests and prophets: hence Lycophron, who has continually allusions to obsolete terms, calls the two diviners, Mopsus and Amphilochus, ???a?.

[40]???a?de ?e????? ???a?? p??? e???a??

??t??t????? sfa?a?s? ???a???? ?Y??S ???e?te? a??a???s? ???s???? ?a?.

Upon which the Scholiast observes: ???e? ?? ?a?te??: _by Cunes are meant Diviners:_ and again, ???a? ?p??????? t??? a?te?? e?pe??. _The Poet, by_ ???a?, _means the ministers and prophets of Apollo._ Upon this the learned [41]Meursius observes, that Lycophron had here made use of a term imported from Egypt: so that, I think, we cannot be mistaken about the purport of the word, however it may have been perverted.

The name of the Deity, Canouphis, expressed also Canuphis, and Cnuphis, was compounded with this term. He was represented by the Egyptians as a princely person, with a serpent entwined round his middle, and embellished with other characteristics, relating to time and duration, of which the serpent was an emblem. Oph, and Ouph, signified a serpent in the Amonian language; and the Deity was termed Can-uph, from his serpentine representation. The whole species, in consequence of this, were made sacred to him, and styled Canyphian. To this Lucan alludes, when, in speaking of the Seps, he calls all the tribe of serpents Cinyphias pestes:

[42]Cinyphias inter pestes tibi palma nocendi.

Canuphis was sometimes expressed Anuphis and Anubis; and, however rendered, was by the Greeks and Romans continually spoken of as a dog; at least they supposed him to have had a dog's head, and often mention his [43]barking.

But they were misled by the t.i.tle, which they did not understand. The Egyptians had many emblematical personages, set off with heads of various animals, to represent particular virtues and affections, as well as to denote the various attributes of their G.o.ds. Among others was this canine figure, which I have no reason to think was appropriated to Canuph, or Cneph. And though upon gems and marbles his name may be sometimes found annexed to this character, yet it must be looked upon as a Grecian work, and so denominated in consequence of their mistaken notion. For we must make a material distinction between the hieroglyphics of old, when Egypt was under her own kings; and those of later date, when that country was under the government of the Greeks: at which time their learning was greatly impaired, and their antient theology ruined. Horus Apollo a.s.sures us, if any credit may be given to what he says, that this canine figure was an emblem of the earth: [44]?????e??? ??af??te? ?????efa??? ????af??s?.

_When they would describe the earth, they paint a Cunocephalus._ It could not, therefore, I should think, in any degree relate to Canuphis. The same[45] writer informs us, that under the figure of a dog they represented a priest, or sacred scribe, and a prophet; and all such as had the chief management of funerals: also the spleen, the smell, sneezing; rule and government, and a magistrate, or judge: which is a circ.u.mstance hardly to be believed. For, as hieroglyphics were designed to distinguish, it is scarce credible that the Egyptians should crowd together so many different and opposite ideas under one character, whence nothing could well ensue but doubt and confusion. Besides, I do not remember, that in any group of antient hieroglyphics the figure of a dog occurs. The meaning of this history, I think, may be with a little attention made out. The Egyptians were refined in their superst.i.tions, above all the nations in the world; and conferred the names and t.i.tles of their Deities upon vegetables and animals of every species; and not only upon these, but also upon the parts of the human body, and the very pa.s.sions of the mind. Whatever they deemed salutary, or of great value, they distinguished by the t.i.tle of Sacred, and consecrated it to some [46]G.o.d. This will appear from words borrowed from Egypt. The Laurel, Laurus, was denominated from Al-Orus: the berry was termed bacca, from Bacchus; Myrrh, ????a was from Ham-Ourah; Casia, from Chus. The Crocodile was called Caimin and Campsa; the Lion, El-Eon; the Wolf, El-Uc; the Cat, Al-Ourah: whence the Greeks formed ?e??, ?????, a???????. The Egyptians styled Myrrh, Baal; balsam, baal-samen; Camphire, Cham-phour, ?af???a of Greece; Opium, Ophion. The sweet reed of Egypt was named [47]Canah, and Conah, by way of eminence; also, [48]Can-Osiris.

Cinnamon was denominated from Chan-Amon; Cinnabar, ????aa???, from Chan-Abor; the sacred beetle, Cantharus, from Chan-Athur. The harp was styled Cinnor, and was supposed to have been found out by Cinaras; which terms are compounded of Chan-Or, and Chan-Arez; and relate to the Sun, or Apollo, the supposed inventor of the lyre. Priests and magistrates were particularly honoured with the additional t.i.tle of Cahen; and many things held sacred were liable to have it in their composition. Hence arose the error of Horus Apollo; who, having been informed that the antient Egyptians distinguished many things which were esteemed holy by this sacred t.i.tle, referred the whole to hieroglyphics, and gave out that they were all represented under the figure of a dog. And it is possible, that in later times the Grecian artists, and the mixed tribes of Egypt, may have expressed them in this manner; for they were led by the ear; and did not inquire into the latent purport of the [49]theology transmitted to them.

From hence we may perceive how little, in later times, even the native Egyptians knew of their rites and history.

Farther accounts may be produced from the same writer, in confirmation of what I have been saying. He not only mentions the great veneration paid by the Egyptians to dogs, but adds, that in many temples they kept ?????efa???, a kind of baboons, or animals with heads like those of dogs, which were wonderfully endowed. By their a.s.sistance the Egyptians found out the particular periods of the Sun and Moon. These did not, like other animals, die at once, but by piece-meal; so that one half of the animal was oftentimes buried, while the other half[50] survived. He moreover a.s.sures us, that they could read and write; and whenever one of them was introduced into the sacred apartments for probation, the priest presented him with a [51]tablet, and with a pen and ink; and by his writing could immediately find out if he were of the true intelligent breed. These animals are said to have been of infinite use to the antient Egyptians in determining times and seasons; for it seems they were, in some particular functions, the most accurate and punctual of any creatures upon earth: [52]Per aequinoctia enim duodecies in die urinam reddere, et in nocte[53] compertus (Cunocephalus), aequali interst.i.tio servato, Trismegisto ansam dedit diem dividendi in duodecim partes aequales. Such is the history of these wonderful [54]animals. That Apes and Baboons were, among the Egyptians, held in veneration, is very certain. The Ape was sacred to the G.o.d Apis; and by the Greeks was rendered Capis, and [55]Ceipis. The Baboon was denominated from the Deity[56] Babon, to whom it was equally sacred. But what have these to do with the supposed Cunocephalus, which, according to the Grecian interpretation, is an animal with the head of a dog? This characteristic does not properly belong to any species of Apes, but seems to have been unduly appropriated to them. The term Cunocephalus, ?????efa???, is an Egyptian compound: and this strange history relates to the priests of the country, styled Cahen; also to the novices in their temples; and to the examinations, which they were obliged to undergo, before they could be admitted to the priesthood. To explain this, I must take notice, that in early times they built their temples upon eminences, for many reasons; but especially for the sake of celestial observations. The Egyptians were much addicted to the study of astronomy: and they used to found their colleges in Upper Egypt upon rocks and hills, called by them Caph. These, as they were sacred to the Sun, were farther denominated Caph-El, and sometimes Caph-Aur, and Caph-Arez. The term Caph-El, which often occurs in history, the Greeks uniformly changed to ?efa??, Cephale: and from Cahen-Caph-El, the sacred rock of Orus, they formed ?????efa??, and ?????efa???; which they supposed to relate to an animal with the head of a dog. But this Cahen-Caph-El was certainly some royal seminary in Upper Egypt, whence they drafted novices to supply their colleges and temples. These young persons were, before their introduction, examined by some superior priest; and, accordingly as they answered upon their trial, they were admitted, or refused. They were denominated Caph-El, and Cahen-Caph-El, from the academy where they received their first instruction; and this place, though sacred, seems to have been of a cla.s.s subordinate to others. It was a kind of inferior cloister and temple, such as Capella in the Romish church; which, as well as Capella.n.u.s, was derived from Egypt: for, the church, in its first decline, borrowed largely from that country. That there was some particular place of this sort situated upon a rock or eminence, may, I think, be proved from Martia.n.u.s Capella; and, moreover, that it was a seminary well known, where the youth of Upper Egypt were educated. For, in describing the sciences, under different personages, he gives this remarkable account of Dialectica upon introducing her before his audience.

[57]Haec se educatam dicebat in _aegyptiorum Rupe;_ atque in Parmenidis exinde gymnasium, atque Atticam demea.s.se. And Johannes Sarisburiensis seems to intimate that Parmenides obtained his knowledge from the same quarter, when he mentions [58]"_in Rupe_ vitam egisse. In this short detail we have no unpleasing account of the birth of science in Egypt, and of its progress thence to Attica. It is plain that this Rupes aegyptiaca could be nothing else but a seminary, either the same, or at least similar to that, which I have before been describing. As the Cunocephali are said to have been sacred to Hermes, this college and temple were probably in the nome of Hermopolis. Hermes was the patron of Science, and particularly styled Cahen, or [59]Canis: and the Cunocephali are said to have been worshipped by the people of that [60]place. They were certainly there reverenced: and this history points out very plainly the particular spot alluded to.

Hermopolis was in the upper region styled Thebas: and there was in this district a tower, such as has been [61]mentioned. It was in aftertimes made use of for a repository, where they laid up the tribute. This may have been the Rupes aegyptiaca, so famed of old for science; and which was the seat of the Chancephalim, or Cunocephalians.

It is said of the Cunocephali, that when one part was dead and buried, the other still survived. This can relate to nothing else but a society, or body politic, where there is a continual decrement, yet part still remains; and the whole is kept up by succession. It is an enigma, which particularly relates to the priesthood in Egypt: for the sacred office there was hereditary, being vested in certain families; and when part was dead, a residue still [62]survived, who admitted others in the room of the deceased. [63]?pea? de t?? ap??a??, t??t?? ? pa?? a?t??at?stata?. The sons, we find, supplied the place of their fathers: hence the body itself never became extinct, being kept up by a regular succession. As to the Cunocephali giving to Hermes the first hint of dividing the day into twelve parts from the exactness, which was observed in their [64]evacuations, it is a surmise almost too trifling to be discussed. I have shewn that the Cunocephali were a sacred college, whose members were persons of great learning: and their society seems to have been a very antient inst.i.tution.

They were particularly addicted to astronomical observations; and by contemplating the heavens, styled Ouran, they learned to distinguish the seasons, and to divide the day into parts. But the term Ouran the Greeks by a strange misconception changed to ???e??; of which mistake they have afforded other instances: and from this abuse of terms the silly figment took its rise.

The Cunocephali are not to be found in Egypt only, but in India likewise; and in other parts of the world. Herodotus [65]mentions a nation of this name in Libya: and speaks of them as a race of men with the heads of dogs.

Hard by in the neighbourhood of this people he places the ??efa???, men with no heads at all: to whom, out of humanity, and to obviate some very natural distresses, he gives eyes in the breast. But he seems to have forgot mouth and ears, and makes no mention of a nose: he only says, [66]??efa???, ?? e? st??es?? ?f?a???? e???te?. Both these and the Cunocephali were denominated from their place of residence, and from their worship: the one from Cahen-Caph-El, the other from Ac-Caph-El: each of which appellations is of the same purport, the right n.o.ble, or sacred [67]rock of the Sun.

Similar to the history of the Cunocephali, and Acephali, is that of the Cunodontes. They are a people mentioned by Solinus and Isidorus, and by them are supposed to have had the teeth of dogs. Yet they were probably denominated, like those above, from the object of their worship, the Deity Chan-Adon; which the Greeks expressed ????d??, and styled his votaries [68]Cunodontes.

The Greeks pretended, that they had the use of the sphere, and were acquainted with the zodiac, and its asterisms very early. But it is plain from their mistakes, that they received the knowledge of these things very late; at a time when the terms were obsolete, and the true purport of them not to be obtained. They borrowed all the schemes under which the stars are comprehended from the Egyptians: who had formed them of old, and named them from circ.u.mstances in their own religion and mythology. They had particularly conferred the t.i.tles of their Deities upon those stars, which appeared the brightest in their hemisphere. One of the most remarkable and brilliant they called Cahen Sehor; another they termed Purcahen; a third Cahen Ourah, or Cun Ourah. These were all misconstrued, and changed by the Greeks; Cahen-Sehor to Canis Sirius; P'urcahen to Procyon; and Cahen Ourah to Cunosoura, the dog's tail. In respect to this last name I think, from the application of it in other instances, we may be a.s.sured that it could not be in acceptation what the Greeks would persuade us: nor had it any relation to a dog. There was the summit of a hill in Arcadia of this [69]name: also a promontory in [70]Attica; and another in [71]Euba. How could it possibly in its common acceptation be applicable to these places?

And as a constellation if it signified a dog's tail, how came it to be a name given to the tail of a bear? It was a term brought from [72]Sidon, and Egypt: and the purport was to be sought for from the language of the Amonians.

The antient h.e.l.ladians used upon every promontory to raise pillars and altars to the G.o.d of light, Can-Our, the Chan-Orus of Egypt. But Can-Our, and Can-Ourah, they changed to ????s???a, as I have shewn: yet notwithstanding this corruption, the true name is often to be discovered.

The place which is termed Cunosoura by Lucian, in his Icaromemenippus, is called Cunoura by Stepha.n.u.s Byzant, and by [73]Pausanias. Cunoura is also used by Lycophron, who understood antient terms full well, for any high rock or headland.

[74]?? ??s? p??? ??????a ?ap????? s?asa?

?e???? ?d??ta?.

???? ??????a, p??? t?a?e?a? pet?a?. Scholiast. ibid.

We find the same mistake occur in the account transmitted to us concerning the first discovery of purple. The antients very gratefully gave the merit of every useful and salutary invention to the G.o.ds. Ceres was supposed to have discovered to men corn, and bread: Osiris shewed them the use of the plough; Cinyras of the harp: Vesta taught them to build. Every Deity was looked up to as the cause of some blessing. The Tyrians and Sidonians were famous for the manufacture of purple: the die of which was very exquisite, and the discovery of it was attributed to Hercules of Tyre; the same who by Palaephatus is styled Hercules [75]Philosophus. But some will not allow him this honour; but say, that the dog of Hercules was the discoverer. For accidentally feeding upon the Murex, with which the coast abounded, the dog stained his mouth with the ichor of the fish; and from hence the first hint of dying was [76]taken. This gave birth to the proverbial expression, [77]????a ????? ?? ? seast? p??f??a. Nonnus mentions the particular circ.u.mstance of the dog's staining his mouth:

[78]????ea? p??f??e pa???da? ??at? ??????.

Such is the story, which at first sight is too childish to admit of credit.